Step 4: methodology. What did you do or what will you have done by the time the presentation happens to solve the problem like you said you would? Reflecting on 52 semi-structured interviews with foreign soldiers and locally-recruited interpreters collected during a project on peace operations in Bosnia-Herzegovina, This is where your research volunteers as tribute.
Summarising your methodology was it interview-based? Attending at least two conferences per year means having to stay on top of data collection, data analysis, presentation skills and networking. It also gives you the chance to think about your work from several angles, and especially about how it fits into the existing dialogue between researchers in your field, which is extremely useful for sitting down and writing papers ideally right when you return from the conference.
But it also means that, as much as my summers are characterized by last minute analyses, PowerPoint slides, practice talks, packing, travel and jet-lag, the winter months are characterized by writing abstracts, and finding an interesting story to tell about my research….
Well, maybe not a handful. Maybe more like or words. No matter how much experience I have gained with writing abstracts so far, the length of time it takes me to produce a good abstract is always the same: about 30 minutes of writing, followed by 30 hours of…un-writing.
Yes, it always takes me infinitely longer to cut my text, in order to get my story to fit into the little submission box online. Feel satisfied and deeply excited about my research! How will you study it? What will you use to demonstrate your conclusions? What are those conclusions? What do they mean? Stylistic considerations The abstract should be one paragraph and should not exceed the word limit. Edit it closely to be sure it meets the Four C's of abstract writing: Complete — it covers the major parts of the project.
Concise — it contains no excess wordiness or unnecessary information. Clear — it is readable, well organized, and not too jargon-laden. Cohesive — it flows smoothly between the parts. The importance of understandable language Because all researchers hope their work will be useful to others, and because good scholarship is increasingly used across disciplines, it is crucial to make the language of your abstracts accessible to a non-specialist. Simplify your language. Friends in another major will spot instantly what needs to be more understandable.
Some problem areas to look for: Eliminate jargon. Showing off your technical vocabulary will not demonstrate that your research is valuable. If using a technical term is unavoidable, add a non-technical synonym to help a non-specialist infer the term's meaning. Omit needless words—redundant modifiers, pompous diction, excessive detail. With money for conferences sometimes in short supply, check with your supervisor or colleagues whether this is the best conference.
If you are certain, Track down the names of the session organisers. Remember that in general, conference organisers only like to include presentations by people who have completed their work. This is a key piece of information they use to judge whether your work is suitable for the conference! Whilst important members of your field, including your supervisor, may have a laissez-faire attitude to submitting on time, you are unlikely to have that luxury. Remember to draft the abstract early and enquire whether your supervisor will offer constructive criticism before you send it off.
Abstract structure — attention to detail Every discipline is different, but there are some general guidelines that you can follow. Abstracts are often broken down into three paragraphs: Paragraph 1: What the problem is and why people should care.
Introduce the context of your study, perhaps including the particular issue or question your study responds to.
It helps if you can demonstrate that your question or issue is interesting and worth answering.
Whatever kind of research you are doing, your abstract should provide the reader with answers to the following questions: What are you asking? It also gives you the chance to think about your work from several angles, and especially about how it fits into the existing dialogue between researchers in your field, which is extremely useful for sitting down and writing papers ideally right when you return from the conference. Does the abstract indicate the value of the findings and to whom will they be of use? In March of , the Massachusetts legislature passed an act disbanding the white guardians appointed to conduct affairs for the Mashpee tribe and incorporated Mashpee as an Indian district. It should be original. Is it paradoxical, or futile, to do so?
Have your sponsoring professor work with you and approve the abstract before you submit it online. Thus far, initial findings in analyzing the digital images created during the filming process have indicated that all fuels tested have similar travel times. Remember, you are not expected to have already written your conference paper, but you are expected to have done enough research that you are prepared to write about a specific topic that you can adequately cover in minutes.
However, it is also important, for a conference paper, to ensure that the title describes the subject you are writing about. This meant that each of those abstracts was less likely to be accepted than an abstract focusing on a different aspect of the research process, because we wanted to offer delegates a good balance of presentations.
How will you study it? This paper will argue the tribe asserted its power within the political and physical landscape to reclaim their meetinghouse and the parsonage land. Does the abstract title describe the subject being written about?
Why write an abstract? Is it paradoxical, or futile, to do so? First, your conference abstract is a sales tool: you are selling your ideas, first to the conference organisers, and then to the conference delegates. How will they contribute to your field? This is a general guide for crafting stand-out conference paper abstracts.
Burial first began to take hold in the western Roman Empire during the early second century, with the appearance of finely-crafted sarcophagi, but elites from the Roman world did not discuss the practices of cremation and burial in detail. What is new to our understanding as the result of your inquiry?
The evaluators will trust you have not engaged into a PhD or managed it to your third year without having appropriated the theoretical and conceptual basics.
Some problem areas to look for: Eliminate jargon. But before you even get to the stress of writing a presentation, you have to be successful in the scrum that is abstract submission. Use active voice and pay attention to excessive prepositional phrasing. Clarity of Presentation: Does the abstract clearly define the topic, scope, and methodologies? Cremation vanished by the third century, replaced by the practice of the distant past by the fifth century. Here, Albrecht Sonntag explains how to make sure yours stands out to the conference organisers.